Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
1
Finding Our Delight in the Lord:
A Proposal
for Full Communion
Between
The
Episcopal Church;
the
Moravian Church–Northern Province; and
the
Moravian Church–Southern Province
Table of Contents
I.
Preface
II.
Introduction
III.
Foundational Principles
IV. Ministry of Bishops
V.
Reconciliation of
Ministries
a)
Ministries of Oversight
b)
Ministry of Bishops
c)
Ministry of Presbyters
d)
Ministry of Deacons
VI. Interchangeability of
Clergy
VII. Joint Commission
VIII. Wider Context
IX. Existing Relationships
X.
Other Dialogues
XI. Conclusion
XII. Appendices
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
2
I.
Preface
Preaching at the opening service of the Second
World Conference of Faith and Order in
1937, William Temple (then Archbishop of York and later Archbishop of
Canterbury) noted two
“great evils” caused by the divisions of the church:
The first is that [the divisions] obscure our witness to the one Gospel; the
second is that
through the division each party to it loses some spiritual treasure, and none
perfectly
represents the balance of truth, so that this balance of truth is not presented
to the world at
all.1
It is because of these two
“great evils” of Christian disunity that our churches—The Episcopal
Church and the Moravian
Church in America (Northern and Southern Provinces)—have pursued
a formal dialogue resulting
in this proposal for full communion, a necessary step toward “the
goal of visible unity in
one faith and one eucharistic fellowship expressed in worship and
common life in Christ.”2
We seek this relationship of full communion so that our mission as
Christ’s church will be
more effectively fulfilled and each of our communions might be more
complete because of the
spiritual treasures of the other; and we do this for the sake of the world,
“so that the world may
believe.”3
We have also been motivated
by the ecumenical history and legacy of our two churches.
For Moravians, ecumenical
commitment is rooted in the vision of Count Nicolaus Ludwig von
Zinzendorf, bishop and
theologian of the renewed Unitas Fratrum. In the spirit of Count
1
William Temple, “Sermon at the Opening Service”
in Michael Kinnamon and Brian E. Cope,
(eds.) The Ecumenical
Movement: An Anthology of Key Texts and Voices. Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 1997, 18.
2
Toward a Common Understanding and Vision of
the World Council of Churches, 3.10,
www.coe.org/wcc/who/cuv-e.html.
3
John 17:20–21: “I
ask not only on behalf of these, but also on behalf of those who will believe
in me through
their word, that they may all be one. As you, Father, are in me and I am in you,
may they also
be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me.”
(NRSV)
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
3
Zinzendorf’s ecumenical
commitment, “The Ground of the Unity,” endorsed and accepted by all
the provinces of the
Moravian Church, states that “through the grace of Christ the different
denominations have received
many gifts and that the Church of Christ may be enriched by these
many and varied
contributions. It is our desire that we may learn from one another and rejoice
together in the riches of
the love of Christ and the manifold wisdom of God. We welcome every
step that brings us nearer
the goal of unity in Him.”4
The Episcopal Church’s ecumenical
commitment is expressed
through the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral (endorsed by numerous
General Conventions of The
Episcopal Church and Lambeth Conferences of Bishops), which
commits The Episcopal
Church to the search for the more visible unity of the church on the basis
of what it considers the
essentials of the Christian faith. It is the prayer of all who have
participated in this
dialogue that Finding Our
Delight in the Lord: A Proposal for Full
Communion
may empower our churches to share their
treasures with each other, strengthen their
witness to the Gospel, and
advance the unity and renewal of the church.
On the basis of this
agreement, The Episcopal Church, the Northern Province of the
Moravian Church, and the
Southern Province of the Moravian Church agree that, in their
respective General
Convention and Provincial Synods, there shall be one vote to accept or reject,
without amendment, the full
set of agreements to follow. If adopted, each church agrees to make
the legislative and any
other necessary changes appropriate for full communion between the
churches.
4
Church Order of the Unitas Fratrum (Moravian
Church) 2002, “The Ground of the
Unity,” ś6.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
4
II.
Introduction
2.
At their respective 2002
Synods the Northern and Southern Provinces of the Moravian
Church voted to enter into
a relationship of Interim Eucharistic Sharing with The Episcopal
Church. In August of 2003
the General Convention of The Episcopal Church passed an identical
resolution. These actions
inaugurated a relationship of Interim Eucharistic Sharing between the
two churches. Building upon
over two centuries of ecumenical dialogues between Anglicans and
Moravians,5
the Moravian-Episcopal Dialogue, meeting from 1999–2003, and working from
the
Fetter Lane Declaration,6
came to consensus on the fundamental aspects of the Christian faith
and recognized one another
as belonging to the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.7
Since
2003, the
Moravian-Episcopal Dialogue has focused on the one remaining issue upon which
consensus has not been
reached: the ordained ministry. An interchangeable ministry is an
essential element of each
of our churches’ understanding of full communion with another
Christian denomination.8
5
For the background on Anglican-Moravian
relations, see Anglican-Moravian Conversations:
The Fetter Lane Common
Statement with Essays in Anglican and Moravian History
(London:
Council for Christian
Unity, 1996), 72–82.
6
From 1989–1995 the Church of England and the
Moravian Church in Great Britain and Ireland
engaged in a dialogue which
produced substantial theological agreement, as well as noted areas
upon which consensus had
not been reached. This dialogue summarized their work in Anglican-
Moravian Conversations,
and in the Fetter Lane Declaration the two churches “acknowledged
one another’s churches as
belonging to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church” and
committed “to share a
common life and mission.” See Anglican-Moravian Conversations, 30–32.
7
See Resolution A087 of the 74th
General Convention; Resolution 23 of the 2002 Southern
Province Synod; First
Partial Report, Committee on Ecumenical Affairs and Faith and Order,
2002 Northern Province
Synod. See also “The Meaning of Full Communion for Moravians,” as
approved by the 2006 Synod
of the Moravian Church–Northern, Fifth and Final Partial Report,
Mission with Our Ecumenical
Partners, Resolution 11.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
5
3.
The Moravian-Episcopal
dialogue has set full communion, defined as follows, as the
means to the greater unity
to which our churches strive, and for which we believe our Lord
prayed (John 17:20–22):
We understand full communion to be a living
relationship between distinct churches in which
they recognize each other as catholic9
and apostolic churches holding the essentials of
the
Christian faith, whereby the reconciliation, mutual availability, and
interchangeability of
ordained ministries is then fully
possible. Full communion is not the same as organic union or
merger. Rather, it is
widely recognized as a significant expression of the full visible unity of all
Christians, which we do not
yet discern but for which we pray. Within this full communion, we
understand that the
churches are fully interdependent while remaining responsible for their own
decisions. Full communion
includes a commitment to establish, locally and nationally,
recognized organs of
regular consultation and communication in order to express and strengthen
the fellowship and enable
common witness, life, and service. Striving to end our divisions but to
preserve our diversity,
neither of our churches seeks to remake the other in its own image, and
each seeks to be open to
the gifts of the other as it seeks to be faithful to Christ and his mission.
8
See the Guidelines on Unity endorsed by the 1979
General Convention: “The visible unity we
seek is one eucharistic
fellowship….In this communion the churches will all recognize each
other’s members and
ministries….” See also Called to Common Mission: A Lutheran Proposal
for a Revision of the
Concordat of Agreement (hereafter
CCM), ś 2; see also “Meaning of Full
Communion for Moravians,”
2006 Northern Province Synod and 2002 Southern Province
Synod.
9
Our two churches are catholic in the original
sense of the word, meaning “universal.” The
Episcopal Church
understands itself to be catholic in that it “proclaims the whole Faith to all
people, to the end of time”
(Book of Common Prayer, hereafter BCP, 854). The Moravian
Church likewise understands
catholic to mean “universal” (Moravian Book of Worship, hereafter
MBW,
3).
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
6
Each church shall be open to the encouragement and
admonition of the other church for the sake
of the gospel.10
4.
The two churches have also
put forward their understandings of the basis upon which full
communion is to be reached.
For the Moravian Church in America, this understanding is found
in “The Ground of the
Unity,” and for The Episcopal Church in the Chicago-Lambeth
Quadrilateral.
5.
“The Ground of the Unity,”
first adopted by the international synod of the Moravian
Church in 1957, is a brief
statement of the Moravian understanding of Christian faith and
discipleship. Its
ecclesiological paragraphs define the church as a unity, a fellowship, and a
community of service. “The
Ground of the Unity” affirms, first and foremost, that Christian
unity is God-given and that
our Savior is leading us to its ever deeper realization. Moravians
recognize that “through the
grace of Christ the different churches have received many gifts,”11
all
of them necessary for the
upbuilding of the body of Christ (Ephesians 4:15–17). The Moravian
Church understands its
particular calling to be the promotion of Christian unity among the
denominations in the
service of more effective mission. Moravians believe that, even though
ecumenical engagement is
“laid upon us as a charge,” unity cannot be achieved by human effort
alone but is received as an
unfolding promise from the Lord. In the words of “The Ground of the
10
See CCM, ś 2; “Meaning of Full Communion
for Moravians,” as stated by the Southern
Province at its 2002 Synod.
See also the definition of full communion endorsed by the 2006
Synod of the Northern
Province of the Moravian Church. Each of these statements may be found
in the Appendix to this
agreement.
11
Church Order of the Unitas Fratrum (Moravian
Church) 2002, “The Ground of the
Unity,”
(hereafter COUF) ś6.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
7
Unity,” “We believe in and
confess the unity of the Church, given in the one Lord Jesus Christ as
God and Savior. He died
that he might unite the scattered children of God. As the living Lord
and Shepherd, he is leading
his flock toward such unity.… It is the Lord’s will that Christendom
should give evidence of and
seek unity in Him with zeal and love.”12 “The Unitas Fratrum
is
committed to the unity of
the children of God as a reality created by God in Jesus Christ.”13
6.
The Chicago-Lambeth
Quadrilateral of 1886, as endorsed and modified by the Lambeth
Conference of 1888, is the
foundation upon which The Episcopal Church seeks this relationship
of full communion. The
Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral has been endorsed by numerous General
Conventions of The
Episcopal Church and commended by several Lambeth Conferences of
Bishops. There are four
essential elements to the Quadrilateral as affirmed by the Lambeth
Conference of 1888: 1) The
Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the revealed
Word of God; 2) The Nicene
Creed as the sufficient statement of the Christian Faith; 3) The two
Sacraments,—Baptism and the
Supper of the Lord,—ministered with unfailing use of Christ’s
words of institution and of
the elements ordained by Him; 4) The Historic Episcopate, locally
adapted in the methods of
its administration to the varying needs of the nations and peoples
called of God into the
unity of His Church.14
12
Ibid.
13
Church Order of the Unitas Fratrum (Moravian
Church) 2002, “The Witness of the
Unitas
Fratrum,” ś150.
14
BCP,
877–878.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
8
We see the Moravian Church
and The Episcopal Church as being led together toward the
unity our Lord enjoins for
the sake of furthering Christ’s mission. This agreement is a step
towards fulfilling that
promise.
7.
The Episcopal Church and
the Northern and Southern Provinces of the Moravian Church
commend “The Ground of the
Unity” and the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral as the sources
which inform our two
churches’ journey towards full communion. We seek not only to recognize
our ministers, but to work
together in the mission of God (mission Dei). We are striving to carry
out this mission dei
in a closer partnership. As a means of doing this, we also seek ways to allow
for the interchangeability
of our ordained ministries as well as ordained ministers.15
III.
Foundational Principles
We now seek to state our
agreement on how oversight is expressed in both of our churches and
the ministry of
bishops/historic episcopate, locally adapted.
8.
We understand the ministry
of oversight to be the way our churches delegate the good
ordering of the church to
representative bodies as well as to certain individuals called and
15
On this
path towards a reconciled ministry, for Episcopalians this agreement affirms
that the two
churches
are in complete agreement on the first three points of the Chicago-Lambeth
Quadrilateral. In the
respective
Resolutions on Interim Eucharistic Sharing, each church declared that: “We
recognize in one
another
the faith of the one, holy, catholic, apostolic, and undivided church as it is
witnessed in the
Moravian
Church in America in the Moravian Book of Worship, ‘The Ground of the
Unity,’ the Moravian
Covenant for Christian Living,
and the Books of Order of the Northern and Southern Provinces and the
Book of
Common Prayer and
the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church.” In the same
Resolution
establishing Interim Eucharistic Sharing both churches also affirmed the
doctrinal statement
produced
by the Church of England-Moravian Church dialogues, which may be found in the
Appendices.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
9
commissioned to a ministry
of oversight in a collegial fashion. In both of our churches, oversight
is expressed conferentially
and collegially through a variety of mutually complementary bodies.
9.
Each of our churches is
part of a global communion. Member churches of the Anglican
Communion are autonomous
provinces governed by representative synods which include clergy
and laity.16
Individual provinces of the Unitas Fratrum are governed by representative
synods
which include clergy and
laity, and are also part of a single, worldwide church governed by a
Unity Synod which includes
clergy and lay representative from the provinces.
10.
In addition, between
Provincial Synods and General Conventions, regular oversight of
the church is provided by
an elected, representative body or bodies which consist of clergy and
laity. In the Northern and
Southern Provinces, oversight is provided by a Provincial Elders’
Conference (hereafter
abbreviated PEC). In the Northern Province, the PEC is comprised of four
clergy and four lay
persons; in the Southern Province, three clergy and two lay persons. The
PECs and the President of
the PEC are elected by provincial synods.
11.
In The Episcopal Church,
between meetings of General Convention, oversight is
provided by an Executive
Council, the Presiding Bishop, and relevant Commissions,
Committees, Agencies, and
Boards. On the diocesan level, each diocese holds a diocesan
16
See the Preamble to the Constitution of The
Episcopal Church: “The Protestant Episcopal
Church in the United States
of America, otherwise known as The Episcopal Church (which name
is hereby recognized as
also designating the Church), is a constituent member of the Anglican
Communion, a Fellowship
within the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, of those duly
constituted Dioceses,
Provinces, and regional Churches in communion with the See of
Canterbury, upholding and
propagating the historic Faith and Order as set forth in the Book of
Common Prayer.”
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
10
convention once a year for
the purpose of managing its affairs. Each diocese also has a Standing
Committee consisting of
clergy and lay representation, elected at diocesan convention. The
Standing Committee works in
conjunction with the diocesan bishop in providing oversight for
the diocese.
12.
At the parish level,
Episcopal congregations are governed by a rector and Vestry. The
Vestry consists of lay
members elected at an annual meeting and shares in the oversight of all
aspects of congregational
life with the rector. Most Moravian congregations have a Board of
Elders, chaired by the
pastor, which oversees the spiritual affairs of the congregation and a Board
of Trustees which oversees
and directs the financial affairs and cares for the church property.
13.
Furthermore, each of our
churches has bishops ordained in an historic succession. There
are similarities in the way
bishops function in our two churches: bishops ordain candidates for
the ministry17
and have particular aspects of pastoral responsibility. There are also
differences. In
the Moravian Church,
bishops are primarily pastoral and consultative. They do not function in
administrative oversight by
virtue of their episcopal office, but may be elected to an
administrative office of
oversight (such as the PEC). In The Episcopal Church and the Anglican
tradition, bishops exercise
pastoral and administrative oversight. We do not see these differences
as mutually
exclusive—rather as mutually complementary.
17
In the Moravian Church, bishops ordain
candidates at the request of the PEC. In The Episcopal
Church, the Standing
Committee of the diocese must also approve ordinations of deacon and
priests.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
11
14.
Thus oversight in both of
our churches is exercised in a conferential and collegial
fashion, with clergy and
laity sharing in the governance of the church at all levels, from the local
to the provincial. In
addition, all persons in our churches, lay and ordained, are called in baptism
to engage in God’s mission
through ministry. The following paragraphs summarize our agreed
understanding of the
ministry of lay persons, deacons, presbyters, and bishops.
15.
Ordained Ministry and
the Whole People of God. All members
of Christ’s church are
commissioned for ministry
through baptism.18
Both churches understand the ministers of the
church to be lay persons,
bishops, presbyters/priests, and deacons.19 The ministry of the
ordained
is an expression of the
ministry of the whole people of God and a response to the call and gifts of
Christ who is Chief Elder
of the Church and its ministry.20 However, in order to further
the
mission and witness of the
Church, God calls forth in the church particular ministries of persons
to serve the people through
proclamation of the Word and administration of the sacraments.21
Within the priesthood of
the whole Church, the ministry of the ordained is an appointed means
through which Christ makes
his priesthood present and effective to his people.22
The threefold
18
CCM,
ś 6; MBW, 165; Following Our Shepherd to Full Communion (the
ELCA-Moravian full
communion agreement), ś38;
see also COUF, ś682.
19
“An Outline of the Faith, Commonly Called the
Catechism,” BCP, 855.
20
COUF,
ś 682
21
The COCU Consensus: In Quest of a Church of
Christ Uniting (hereafter
Consensus), Chapter
7, ś30, which is a
paraphrase of Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry (hereafter BEM),
śM13 and its
commentary.
22
The Fetter Lane Common Statement: Towards
Visible Unity between the Church of England
and the Moravian Church
in Great Britain and Ireland
(hereafter Fetter Lane), ś 29, as found in
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
12
pattern of deacon,
presbyter, and bishop has been in existence since the first century.23
The
threefold ministry is a
gift from God for the nurture of God’s people and for the proclamation,
witness, and spread of the
Gospel everywhere.24
These differing forms of ministry
complement
one another and must be
seen in relation to one another within the context of the ministry of the
whole people of God.25
Each of these ministries is expressed in personal, collegial, and
communal manners. They are
personal in that each is exercised by a person who has been
baptized and ordained. They
are collegial in that baptism and ordination alike associate the
individual with others who
share the same call. Each is communal in that each is rooted in the
life of the worshiping and
witnessing congregation and that ministry is exercised with the
cooperation of the whole
community.26
16.
Ministry of lay persons.
Through Baptism, lay persons are called into the ministry of
Jesus Christ and therefore
at the same time into a relationship with other Christians.27
They are
Anglican-Moravian
Conversations: The Fetter Lane Common Statement with Essays in Anglican
and Moravian History
(London: Council for Christian Unity,
1996), 21.
23
BEM,
śM19.
24
BCP,
510.
25
Consensus,
Chapter 7, ś21; see also BEM, śśM5–M6.
26
Consensus,
Chapter 7, ś22.a–c; based on BEM, śM26.
Both The Episcopal Church and the
Moravian Church in America,
Northern and Southern Provinces, have accepted and issued
formal responses to BEM.
The Episcopal Church has specifically commended it as a resource for
ecumenical discussions (see
Resolution A061 from the 1985 General Convention), and the
Moravian Church–Northern
Province, issued its formal endorsement of BEM in the 6th
Partial
Report of the Committee on
Ecumenical Affairs and Faith and Order of the 1986 Provincial
Synod. The 1986 Southern
Province Synod affirmed the response to BEM given by the PEC of
the Southern Province.
27
Consensus,
Chapter 7, ś24.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
13
called to bear witness to
Christ wherever they may be, and, according to the gifts given to them,
to carry on Christ’s work
of reconciliation in the world. They are to take their place in the life,
worship, and governance of
the Church.28
Lay persons who are subsequently ordained
continue
to bear responsibility for
the ministry common to all Christians to which they were called at
Baptism.29
17.
Ministry of deacons.
By struggling in Christ’s name with the myriad needs of societies
and persons, deacons
exemplify the interdependence of worship and service in the Church’s
life.30
Deacons are ordained to a ministry of service and servanthood.31
Deacons are to interpret
to the church the needs,
concerns, and hopes of the world through a special ministry of
servanthood.32
The deacon is understood to be an icon of Christ’s own servant ministry
and to
make Christ’s redemptive
love known, by word and example, in both the church and the world.33
Both churches have retained
the ancient practice of first ordaining as deacons those called
to serve as presbyters.
However we acknowledge that there are differences in how each church
has chosen to interpret the
diaconate In The Episcopal Church, deacons are ordained to a
ministry of Word and
Service. After a duration normally between six months to one year, those
28
BCP,
855.
29
Consensus,
Chapter 7, ś24.
30
BEM,
M31.
31
Book of Order, Moravian Church–Northern Province, ś204 (f)
32
BCP,
543; COUF, ś684.
33
BCP,
543.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
14
persons called to the
presbyterate are so ordained.34 For the Moravian Church, the
intention of
the ordination rite is to
ordain deacons to a ministry of word and sacrament.35
One serves as a
deacon for several years
before being approved for consecration as a presbyter.36
For both
churches, this is
considered a time of practical training for those also called to presbyteral
ministry. In addition, The
Episcopal Church ordains persons as deacons not called to presbyteral
ministry. There is no
equivalent to this in the Moravian Church.
18.
Ministry of
presbyters/priests. Presbyters serve
as pastoral ministers of word and
sacraments in a local
eucharistic community.37
Presbyters are called to work as pastors
and
teachers in a collegial
fashion with other presbyters, with deacons, and with their bishops.38
They
also bear responsibility
for other pastoral acts of the Church such as preparing persons for
confirmation and marriage,
declaring forgiveness of sin, and pronouncing God’s blessing.
Mission is a responsibility
of all who share the ministry of Christ. In the context of this overall
34
Constitution and Canons, Together with the
Rules of Order for the Government of the
Protestant Episcopal
Church n the United States of America Otherwise Known as
The Episcopal Church
(2006) (hereafter Constitution and
Canons), Title III, Canon 9, Sec. 7.
35
See the rite for the Ordination of a Deacon,
Moravian Church, Supplemental Liturgies, S-2, S-
4, and S-7. In the ancient
Unitas Fratrum, deacons served primarily as assistants to the bishop
and did not have
sacramental functions. With the renewal of the church in 18th-century
Germany,
the influence of Count
Zinzendorf and the state Lutheran Church led to the adaptation of the
office of deacon to include
sacramental functions.
36
COUF,
ś868; Moravian Church–Southern Province, Book of Order, ś802; Northern
Province,
Book of Order,
ś205 (a).
37
Fetter Lane,
ś33; BEM, śM30; Moravian Church, Supplemental Liturgies,
Consecration of a
Presbyter, S-14.
38
BCP,
531.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
15
mission of the church,
presbyters, accordingly, are called to leadership in mission. As evangelists
they proclaim the gospel,
teach God’s purposes, and share their personal faith. They bear witness
to God’s work in the world
as well as in the Church. They lead the Church in calling persons to
faith in Jesus Christ and
in establishing congregations. As ministers of word and sacraments,
they pioneer in new forms
of mission. They enlist, renew, equip, and accompany God’s People
as they go out into the
local community, the nation, and the world.39 In addition,
presbyters serve
in a variety of specialized
ministries where they exercise their pastoral ministry. These include
hospital and military
chaplains, service in denominational agencies and boards, and in other
ecumenical settings.
19.
Ministry of bishops.
Bishops represent Christ and his Church; guard the faith, unity, and
discipline of the whole
Church; proclaim the Word of God; and act in Christ’s name for the
reconciliation of the world
and the building up of the church; and ordain others to continue
Christ’s ministry.40
They have pastoral responsibilities in the area to which they are called.41
They are to be the chief
pastors in their area of oversight and have particular responsibilities in
matters of faith and
doctrine.42
Bishops in The Episcopal Church are elected by a
diocese and
exercise oversight of a
specific area.43
Bishops in the Moravian Church are also elected
by
39
The description of presbyters in this paragraph
is drawn from Consensus, Chapter 7, ś56. In
addition, all the functions
of presbyters described in this paragraph may be exercised by deacons
in the Moravian Church.
40
BCP,
855.
41
BEM,
śM29.
42
BCP,
517; COUF, ś688.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
16
representative assemblies
of a specific geographic area, namely, a particular province as a whole,
but are also available as
bishops of the entire Unitas Fratrum.44 Bishops exercise
oversight in
conjunction with lay
persons, deacons, and presbyters. In The Episcopal Church, this is through
Standing Committees,
diocesan conventions, Vestries, and General Convention; and in the
Moravian Church through the
Provincial Elders’ Conference, Provincial Synods, and
congregational Boards of
Elders. Bishops preside at the ordination (and consecration) of deacons
and the ordination and
consecration of presbyters,45 and with other bishops
participate in the
consecration of new
bishops.46
IV.
Ministry of Bishops
20.
As a means to deepen our
joint mission and witness, to allow for an interchangeability of
ordained ministers, and as
a symbol of overcoming the scandal of our division, we seek to
reconcile our episcopal
ministries. In the Church Order of the Unitas Fratrum the Moravian
Church has recognized the
office of bishop as representing “the vital unity of the church and the
43
Diocesan and suffragan bishops are elected by
dioceses which cover specific geographic areas.
The House of Bishops
collectively may elect bishops for certain specific areas of oversight, such
as overseas missionary
dioceses, and elects a bishop with jurisdiction over chaplains in federal
institutions such as
Veterans’ Administration, the Armed Forces, and prison chaplains.
44
Under certain circumstances the Unity Synod, the
governing body of the worldwide Moravian
Church, may elect bishops
for individual provinces. See COUF, ś 260.
45
In The Episcopal Church, the terms “ordain” and
“consecrate” are used in reference to all three
orders of ministry in the
ordination rites. In the Moravian Church’s ordination rites, ordination is
used in reference to
deacons, but only consecration is used with reference to presbyters and
bishops.
46
In The Episcopal Church, this number is at least
three, following ancient practice established
by the Canons of the
Council of Nicaea. In the Moravian Church, this number is at least two; see
COUF,
ś 689.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
17
continuity of the church’s
ministry.”47
The Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral outlines four
elements of the
“substantial deposit of Christian Faith and Order” considered integral to the
visible unity of Christ’s
church. The fourth of these is the “Historic Episcopate, locally adapted
in the methods of its
administration to the varying needs of the nations and peoples called of God
into the unity of His
Church.”48
We jointly affirm the
following understandings of the office of bishop as locally adapted by our
churches:
21.
We affirm that a component
of the ministry of bishops is the exercise of oversight in
conjunction with clergy and
lay persons, as described in paragraphs 8–14 and 19 above. This
nature and form of this
oversight is exercised in different ways in our churches.
22.
We affirm the value of the
office of bishop as a sign, but not a guarantee, of the
succession of the apostolic
faith of the church as a whole.49 We hold that the office of
bishop is a
visible and personal way of
focusing the apostolicity of the whole Church.50
47
COUF,
ś687.
48
BCP,
877.
49
See CCM, ś12; BEM, śM38; see also
COUF, ś687; see Fetter Lane, śś42–45.
50
Porvoo Common Statement,
ś46. The Porvoo Statement established full,
visible unity between
the Church of England,
Church of Ireland, the Scottish Episcopal Church, and the Church of
Wales with the Church
Sweden, the Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church, the Church of
Norway, the Evangelical
Lutheran Church of Lithuania, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of
Iceland, and the
Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
18
23.
We affirm that The
Episcopal Church demonstrated its intent to maintain the office of
bishop through the actions
of state conventions, clergy associations, and the first General
Conventions. Priests were
elected by representative bodies to exercise ministries of oversight and
to serve as chief pastors
and missionaries in designated geographic areas. The Episcopal Church
further demonstrated its
intent to maintain the office of bishop when these individuals sought and
received consecration
through prayer and the laying-on of hands by bishops from the the Scottish
Episcopal Church and the
Church of England.
24.
We affirm that the Moravian
Church has also demonstrated its intent to maintain the
office of bishop. To
further the cause of the necessary reform of the Church, in 1467 the first
members of the Unitas
Fratrum elected persons from among themselves to receive episcopal
consecration. It is not
possible today to determine the source of this consecration, once attributed
to a Waldensian bishop.51
We honor the Moravian Church’s valiant actions to continue the
succession in the office of
bishop in the ancient Unitas Fratrum despite extensive persecution,
and in the renewal of the
office of bishop for the sake of the mission of church.
51
For a discussion of the Unitas Fratrum’s belief
that they received their episcopate from a
Waldensian elder, who in
turn was understood as having preserved a “pure” succession dating
from the pre-Constantinian
Church, see Edwin Sawyer, “The Waldensian Influence on the
Moravian Church,”
Transactions of the Moravian Historical Society, Volume 25 (1988), 47–61.
See also Thomas Ferguson,
“The Moravian Episcopate and The Episcopal Church,” Anglican
and Episcopal History
71:4 (2002), 498–518; Colin Podmore,
“The Moravian Episcopate and
The Episcopal Church: A
Personal Response,” Anglican and Episcopal History 72:3 (2003),
351–384; Thomas Ferguson,
“A Reply to Colin Podmore,” Anglican and Episcopal History 72:3
(2003), 385–390.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
19
25. We affirm the intent of
the Moravian Church to continue to ordain in this succession with
the rebirth of the modern
Moravian Church in 1722, after the near extermination of the ancient
Unitas Fratrum in the
aftermath of severe persecution following the Thirty Years’ War. One of
the last remaining bishops
of the ancient Unitas Fratrum consecrated new bishops for the
Moravian Church in order
more effectively to carry out its newly begun work in the field of
global missions.
26.
The renewed Moravian Church
received the episcopate as an inheritance from the ancient
Unitas Fratrum although it
regards the episcopate in the renewed Unity in a different way from
that of the ancient Unity.
Formerly, a bishop had a governmental and administrative function in
the church. Today, however,
this function is not linked to the episcopal office. Moravians, along
with other Christians, hold
to the understanding, common to both the ancient and renewed Unity,
that Christ is head of the
Church and pastoral oversight is exercised in responsibility to him. This
has received particular
emphasis since the action taken in 1741 to recognize Christ as Chief
Elder of the Moravian
Church.52
A bishop of the Moravian Church is consecrated
to a special
priestly, pastoral ministry
in the name of and for the whole Unity. In the Moravian Church the
52
For several decades following the 1722 renewal,
the Moravian Church did have a Chief Elder
who exercised oversight
over the whole Unitas Fratrum. However upon the resignation of
Leonard Dober as Chief
Elder in 1741, the Moravian Synod was unable to agree upon a
successor. After prayer and
discernment, the Moravian Church chose to recognize Christ alone
as Chief Elder and this
decision was affirmed by the lot which the Moravians often used in
discerning the Savior’s
will in decision making. Thereafter no single individual would govern the
Moravian Church, but all
authority flowed from Christ, the Chief Elder. November 13, 1741, is
kept as a festival on the
liturgical calendar of the Unitas Fratrum as a celebration of the Chief
Eldership of Christ.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
20
office of bishop represents
the vital unity of the church and the continuity of the church’s
ministry.53
27.
We affirm the local
adaptation of the ministry of bishops through the tremendous
faithfulness that the
Moravian Church has demonstrated in maintaining a succession of bishops
which they had originally
understood to be of apostolic origin.
28.
We also affirm the local
adaptation of the historic episcopate by The Episcopal Church.
Bishops in The Episcopal
Church are elected by representative bodies; they exercise oversight in
conjunction with other
bishops, clergy, and lay persons, function collegially in a House of
Bishops which meets
regularly, and elect a Presiding Bishop as Chief Pastor and Primate but
with no jurisdictional
authority. Though many of these elements have been adopted by other
provinces of the Anglican
Communion, at their origin they were innovative adaptations of the
Anglican historic
episcopate for the needs and concerns of the nascent Episcopal Church.
29.
Our two churches are
already exploring areas of common mission, worship, and witness
on local, national, and
global levels. We believe that sharing in ministry of bishops is one of
several ways to deepen
areas of joint mission and witness, and to facilitate more visible
expressions of the unity to
which we are called. Our two churches affirm that we understand that
each church has locally
adapted the historic episcopate for the sake of mission in each of our
churches.
53
COUF,
ś687.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
21
V.
Reconciliation of
Ordained Ministries
a)
Actions of Both Churches
30.
Receiving the gifts of
episcopal ministries. Both churches
pledge to receive the gifts of
one another in regard to
the ministry of bishops. The Episcopal Church therefore pledges to
receive the gift of the
Moravian Church’s understanding that the bishop is consecrated to a
special pastoral ministry
in the area to which he or she exercises oversight. The Episcopal
Church recognizes that the
Moravian Church, through its emphasis on the bishop as being a
pastor of pastors (pastor
pastorum), has a special gift to offer in this relationship of full
communion. We believe that
this Moravian emphasis may well strengthen the historic
association of the bishop
as chief pastor in the Anglican tradition.54 The Moravian Church
in
America acknowledges that
The Episcopal Church has sought to maintain a succession of
apostolic faith and
historic episcopate which the Moravian Church has deemed important in the
establishment and
continuation of its own ministry. Both of our churches recognize that sharing
in episcopal ministries is
a sign of the greater unity of the church for which we all pray.
31.
The Episcopal Church
recognizes that bishops in the Moravian Church are consecrated to
a special priestly,
pastoral ministry. The Episcopal Church acknowledges that the understanding
of the office of bishop in
the Moravian Church in America falls within the parameters of the
historic episcopate,
locally adapted. The Moravian Church recognizes that Episcopal bishops are
54
As expressed in BCP, 518, 855. For a
description of the role of bishops in the Moravian
Church, see COUF,
ś687: “A bishop has responsibility primarily for providing pastoral care to
pastors and the Church.”
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
22
consecrated to a special
ministry of oversight which includes pastoral oversight but also other
additional elements which
are exercised in the Moravian Church in different ways.55
32.
The pattern of sharing in
the episcopal ministry will take the following form. At the
inaugural celebration of
this full communion agreement, there will be a liturgical ceremony.
Members of the PECs of the
Northern and Southern Province, the Presiding Bishop of The
Episcopal Church, and the
President of the House of Deputies of the General Convention, as
representatives of bodies
which provide oversight in our churches, will attend and divide the
duties of presiding among
them as appropriate. This celebration will involve lay persons,
deacons, presbyters, and
bishops, and will be planned by a joint liturgical commission appointed
by the relevant
decision-making bodies in both churches. This ceremony will include bishops in
good standing of the
Northern Province, the Southern Province, the Presiding Bishop of The
Episcopal Church, Episcopal
bishops drawn from dioceses with Moravian congregations located
within them, and one bishop
from each province of The Episcopal Church. Because both of our
churches are in full
communion with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, bishops of
the ELCA, including the
Presiding Bishop, will be invited and may participate as they are able.
Bishops from other
provinces of the Unitas Fratrum and Anglican Communion will be invited to
participate in this
ecumenical event as a sign of the relationship between The Episcopal Church
and the Moravian Church as
provinces of global communions.
55
For example, by the Provincial Elders’
Conferences which are elected boards of laity and
clergy that administer each
province of the Unitas Fratrum.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
23
As part of this ceremony,
the two churches will reconcile episcopal ministries as a means to
reconcile our ordained
ministries. Each church will use liturgical symbols and actions
appropriate in each
communion.
i.
At an appropriate time in
the liturgy, Episcopal bishops will kneel before Moravian
bishops. The Moravian
bishops will lay hands on them and pray, “Eternal God, with
thanksgiving we acknowledge
the ministry these servants have already received and exercised,
and we ask you through your
Holy Spirit to bestow upon them the grace and authority as
understood and required by
this church for the exercise of the ministry of a bishop, for the sake
of the unity of the church,
through Jesus Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the
Holy Spirit, one God,
forever. Amen.” The Moravian bishops then will lay hands on the
Episcopal bishops and pray
the Aaronic blessing: “The Lord bless you and keep you; the Lord
make his face to shine upon
you and be gracious to you; the Lord lift up his countenance upon
you and give you peace. In
the name of Jesus, Amen.” The Episcopal bishops will then stand,
and the Moravian bishops
will offer them the right hand of fellowship. This liturgical symbol is
distinct from the passing
of the peace. In the tradition of the Moravian Church, clergy from other
denominations are welcomed
into ministerial fellowship through the Aaronic blessing and the
right hand of fellowship.
Through these actions, Episcopal bishops present will be understood to
have been welcomed into
fellowship with those who sustained a witness of unity and fidelity to
the gospel since 1457 as
the Unitas Fratrum.
ii.
The Moravian bishops will
kneel before the Episcopal bishops. The Episcopal bishops
will lay hands on the
Moravian bishops and pray, “Eternal God, with thanksgiving we
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
24
acknowledge the ministry
these servants have already received and exercised, and we ask you
through your Holy Spirit to
bestow upon them the grace and authority as understood and
required by this church for
the exercise of the ministry of a bishop, for the sake of the unity of
the church, through Jesus
Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit,
one God, forever. Amen.”
They will then lay hands on the Moravian bishops and pray the
Aaronic blessing: “The Lord
bless you and keep you; the Lord make his face to shine upon you
and be gracious to you; the
Lord lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace. In the
name of Jesus, Amen.” The
peace will then be exchanged. Through these actions the Moravian
bishops present will be
understood to have been incorporated into the historic episcopate, as
understood by The Episcopal
Church, for the sake of full communion.
33.
Following this inaugural
ceremony, in order to provide for a visible expression of the
unity our two churches have
now received in full communion, and to strengthen mission and
witness in areas of the
Moravian Church where full communion will have the greatest impact:
In The Episcopal Church,
at least one Moravian bishop will be present and participate in
the laying-on of hands at
the consecrations of bishops for Episcopal dioceses in the states
of North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, areas with the greatest concentrations of
both Moravians and
Episcopalians.
In the Moravian Church.
At all consecrations of Moravian bishops, at least one bishop of
The Episcopal Church will
be present and participate in the laying-on of hands.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
25
Bishops of the ELCA will
also be invited as a sign of our mutual full communion relationship.
b)
Ministry of Presbyters:
Actions of The Episcopal Church.
34.
In this present document,
our two churches recognize one another as belonging to the
one, holy, Catholic, and
apostolic church and summarize our convergence on the apostolic faith.
This document has
summarized significant convergence on the understanding of the office of
presbyter. To further
empower the full communion that is coming into being by means of this
agreement, The Episcopal
Church now recognizes and affirms the ministries of presbyters in the
Moravian Church as fully
interchangeable. In The Episcopal Church, no persons are allowed to
exercise the offices of
bishop, priest, or deacon unless they have already received such ordination
with the laying-on of hands
by bishops who are themselves duly qualified to confer Holy
Orders.56
Following the inaugural liturgy of full communion, The Episcopal Church
will
consider bishops in the
Moravian Church as bishops duly qualified to confer Holy Orders. The
purpose of this action will
be to permit the interchangeability and reciprocity of presbyters
between the Moravian Church
and The Episcopal Church, without any further ordination or
reordination or
supplemental ordination whatsoever, and will fulfill the provisions of the
Preface
to the Ordination Rites of
the Book of Common Prayer and the Constitution and Canons of The
Episcopal Church.
All current ordained Moravian ministers in good standing as of the date of the
full communion celebration
will thus be considered clergy ordained by bishops in full
communion with The
Episcopal Church and thus eligible to minister in The Episcopal Church.
56
BCP,
510.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
26
c)
Ministry of Presbyters:
Actions of the Moravian Church in America.
35.
The Northern Province of
Moravian Church and the Southern Province of the Moravian
Church recognize the
ministry of presbyters of The Episcopal Church as fully interchangeable. In
practice, as a matter of
its ecumenical ecclesiology, the Moravian Church already recognizes
ordaining authorities of
other communities as being duly qualified to ordain. Currently all
ministers from other
denominations who seek to be received into the Moravian Church are
received as deacons. In
order to allow for interchangeability of ministries, it pledges to request
the international Unity
Synod to amend ś685 of the Church Order of the Unitas Fratrum and
pledges subsequently to
amend its own Books of Order to allow for presbyters of The Episcopal
Church, should they seek to
be received into the Moravian Church to minister permanently, to be
received as presbyters
following completion of the appropriate procedures.57
This proposed
change will not apply to
those seeking occasional service, but only to those who seek to minister
permanently in the Moravian
Church.
36.
The ministry of deacons.
While acknowledging that there are differences in how our
churches have applied the
office of deacon, we do not see these differences as church dividing,
nor do we intend to
diminish the Moravian Church’s understanding of the office of deacon as a
minister of word and
sacrament or The Episcopal Church’s understanding of the deacon as
ordained to a ministry of
word and service. As acknowledged in paragraph 17, there are
differences in how each
church has chosen to interpret the diaconate. At this time, in the
57
The Unity Synod is the governing body of the
worldwide Unity of the Brethren. It meets once
every seven years. The
Unity Synod approves a Church Order for the Unitas Fratrum. Member
provinces may not
contradict this church order, thus the Northern and Southern Provinces must
wait until the next Unity
Synod in 2016 to amend its Books of Order.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
27
Moravian Church, deacons
are ordained to a ministry of Word and Sacrament and in process
towards consecration as a
presbyter. In The Episcopal Church, deacons are ordained to a ministry
of Word and Service and are
either in formation process towards the presbyterate or are
vocational. As we enter
into full communion, we are learning from each other’s approach to the
diaconate, lifting up the
Moravian emphasis on formation and the Episcopal emphasis on service.
As deacons in both Churches
are called for specific ministries in their tradition, and since there
are no parallels to the
vocational diaconate in the Moravian Church, deacons would not be
interchangeable.
Interchangeability of Clergy
37. In this agreement, the two churches declare that each believes the other to
hold all the
essentials of the Christian faith although this does not require from either
church acceptance of
all doctrinal formulations of the other. Ordained ministers serving in
time-certain or temporary
capacities (for example as supply clergy) will be expected to undergo the
appropriate procedures
of that church always respecting the internal discipline of each church. For The
Episcopal
Church, such ministers will be expected to teach and act in a manner that is
consistent with the
doctrine, discipline, and worship of The Episcopal Church.58 For the Moravian Church in
America, such ministers will be expected to promise “obedience to the faith and
order of the
Moravian Church as formulated under Scripture and the Holy Spirit by our Synods
and
constituted authorities.”59
Ordained ministers from either church seeking long-term ministry with
58
CCM,
ś22.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
28
primary responsibility in the other will be expected to apply for clergy
transfer and to agree to
the installation vow or declaration of conformity in the church to which she or
he is applying to
minister permanently.
Joint Commission
38. To assist in
joint planning for mission, both churches authorize the establishment of a joint
commission, fully
accountable to the decision-making bodies of the two churches. Its purpose
will be
consultative, to facilitate mutual support and advice as well as common decision
making
through appropriate
channels in fundamental matters that the churches may face together in the
future. The joint
commission will work with the appropriate boards, committees, commissions,
and staff of the two
churches concerning such ecumenical, doctrinal, pastoral, and liturgical
matters as may
arise, always subject to approval by the appropriate decision-making bodies of
the two churches.
Wider Context
39. Both churches agree
that the historic episcopate can be locally adapted and reformed in the
service of the gospel. In
this spirit they offer this Agreement and growth toward full communion
for serious consideration
among the other churches of the Reformed tradition and to the greater
church. In addition, both
the Moravian Church in America and The Episcopal Church are
members of global
communions, and they offer the fruits of this dialogue to other conversations
59
Ordination of a Deacon, Supplemental Liturgies,
S-5. A similar promise is part of the rites of
Consecration of Presbyters.
Official Text:
Finding Our Delight in the Lord
29
between Anglicans and
Moravians worldwide, particularly to the Anglican Church of Canada
and to the Canadian
District of the Moravian Church in America,60 and to other
Moravian
provinces where there are
judicatories or provinces of The Episcopal Church, with the hope that
they too will be able to
subscribe to this full communion agreement. Each church promises to
issue no official
commentary on this text that has not been accepted by the joint commission as a
legitimate interpretation
thereof.
Existing Relationships
40. Each church agrees that
the other church will continue to live in communion with all the
churches with which the
latter is now in communion. We are especially grateful that both our
churches are already in
full communion with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. This
agreement will mark the
first time three different churches have entered into full communion
with one another based on
separate full communion documents. We welcome this as the
occasion in which the
church of the First (Hussite) Reformation and churches which arose from
the second Reformation have
reconciled themselves on the path towards the visible unity of the
church. In addition, The
Episcopal Church continues to be in communion with Provinces of the
Anglican Communion, with
the Old Catholic Churches of Europe, with the united churches of
the Indian subcontinent,
with the Mar Thoma Church, and with the Philippine Independent
60
There are Moravian congregations in Canada which
are structurally part of the Moravian
Church in America–Northern
Province. Thus passage of this Agreement would be effective for
those congregations which
are part of the Northern Province. Honduras, Alaska and the Eastern
West Indies are separate
provinces of the Unitas Fratrum while the dioceses of Alaska and the
Virgin Islands are
structurally part of The Episcopal Church.
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
30
Church. The Moravian Church
in America, Northern and Southern Provinces, continues to be a
constituent member of the
Unitas Fratrum. This agreement does not imply or inaugurate any
automatic communion between
the Moravian Church in America and those churches with whom
The Episcopal Church is in
full communion, including other provinces of the Anglican
Communion, nor does this
agreement imply or inaugurate any automatic full communion
between The Episcopal
Church and any other provinces of the Unitas Fratrum but does not
preclude provinces of the
Unitas Fratrum which overlap Episcopal dioceses from adopting this
agreement.
Other Dialogues
41. Both churches agree
that each will continue to engage in dialogue with other churches
and traditions. Both of our
churches are in dialogue with churches of the Reformed tradition, and
we offer this Agreement in
the spirit of fellowship to those dialogues. Both churches agree to
take each other and this
agreement into account at every stage in their dialogues with other
churches and traditions.
Where appropriate, both churches will seek to engage in joint dialogues.
On the basis of this
Agreement, both churches pledge that they will not enter into formal
agreements with other
churches and traditions without prior consultation with each other. At the
same time both churches
pledge that they will not impede the development of relationships and
agreements with other
churches and traditions with whom they have been in dialogue. Both of
our churches have regularly
consulted with our common full communion partner, the
Evangelical Lutheran Church
in America.
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
31
Conclusion
42. We receive with
thanksgiving the gift of unity which is already given in Christ.61
In the
words of the Moravian hymn,
we give thanks:
What brought us together,
what joined our hearts?
The pardon which Jesus, our
High Priest, imparts;
’tis this which cements the
disciples of Christ,
who are into one by the
Spirit baptized.
Is this our high calling,
harmonious to dwell,
and thus in sweet concert
Christ’s praises to tell,
in peace and blessed union
our moments to spend
and live in communion with
Jesus our Friend?
O Yes, having found in the
Lord our delight
he is our chief object by
day and by night;
this knits us together, no
longer we roam;
we all have one Father, and
heav’n is our home.62
43. Repeatedly Christians
have echoed the scriptural confession that the unity of the church is
both Christ’s own work and
his call to us. It is therefore our task as well as his gift. We must
“make every effort to
maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3). We
pray that we may rely upon,
and willingly receive from one another, the gifts Christ gives
through his Spirit “for
building up the body of Christ” in love (Ephesians 4:16).
44. We do not know to what
new, recovered, or continuing tasks of mission this agreement will
lead our churches, but we
give thanks to God for leading us to this point. We entrust ourselves to
61
See COUF, ś 6.
62
MBW,
675. Text by Ludolph Ernst Schlicht (1744), tune Confession. Alt. tune
1982 Hymnal
Lyons,
e.g., Hymn 636.
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
32
that leading in the future,
confident that our full communion will be a witness to the gift and goal
already present in Christ,
“so that God may be all in all” (1 Corinthians 15:28). Entering full
communion and thus removing
limitations through mutual recognition of faith, sacraments, and
ministries will bring new
opportunities and levels of shared evangelism, witness, and service. It
is the gift of Christ that
we are sent as he has been sent (John 17:17–26), that our unity will be
received and perceived as
we participate together in the mission of the Son in obedience to the
Father through the power
and presence of the Holy Spirit.
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
33
Appendices
The
Meaning Of Full Communion For Moravians
As
adopted in the Fifth Partial and Final Report of the Mission with Our Ecumenical
Partners Mission Team of the
2006
Synod of the Moravian Church–Northern Province, June 19, 2006.
Why We
Pursue Full Communion
In pursuing full communion
with another church, Moravians are remaining faithful to Christ’s
will for his church and to
our Moravian heritage:
▪ On the night before he
died, our Lord Jesus prayed “…that they may all be one. As you,
Father, are in me, and I am
in you, may they also be in us, so that the world may believe
that you have sent me.”
(John 17: 21 NRSV);
▪ “We believe in and
confess the unity of the Church, given in the one Lord Jesus Christ as
God and Savior. He died
that he might unite the scattered children of God. As the living
Lord and Shepherd, he is
leading his flock toward such unity.… It is the Lord’s will that
Christendom should give
evidence of and seek unity in Him with zeal and love.”63
“The
Unitas Fratrum is committed
to the unity of the children of God as a reality created by
God in Jesus Christ.”64
When we can remove any
perceived barriers between ourselves and another church, we live out
our affirmations about
Christ’s Church.
How We
Pursue Full Communion
When we mutually affirm a
relationship of full communion with another church:
▪ We recognize and value
the gifts present in each other as part of the Body of Christ, and
we will be mutually
enriched by sharing those gifts with each other.
▪ We will cooperate in
common ministries of evangelism, witness, and service.
▪ We mutually recognize and
respect each other as part of the one holy catholic and
apostolic Church, which
affirms its faith through the Apostles’ Creed and the Nicene
Creed.
▪ We mutually recognize
each other’s practice of the two sacraments ordained by Christ
himself—Baptism and the
Lord’s Supper—thus allowing for joint worship, including the
celebration of the Holy
Communion, and for the transfer of membership between
churches as within each
church.
▪ We recognize the validity
of the ministerial orders of the other church, allowing for the
orderly interchange of
ordained ministers subject to the regulations of church order and
practice of each church.
▪ We commit ourselves to
work toward removing all barriers between ourselves and those
with whom we are in full
communion. We acknowledge that current differences in
structure, doctrine,
liturgy, and positions on social and ethical issues may require each
church to speak for itself
at times. At the same time, being in full communion, we shall
be open to the
encouragement and admonition of the other church for the sake of the
Gospel.
63
Church Order of the Unitas Fratrum,
“The Ground of the Unity,” §6.
64
Church Order of the Unitas Fratrum,
“The Witness of the Unitas Fratrum,” §150.
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
34
The
Meaning of Full Communion for Moravians
Report A
from the Christian Unity and Ecumenical Witness Ministry Group to the 2002 Synod
of the Moravian
Church–Southern Province.
1. In pursuing full
communion with another church, Moravians are remaining faithful to
Christ’s will for his
church and to our Moravian heritage:
a. On the night before he
died, our Lord Jesus prayed in his “High Priestly Prayer,” that
“they all may be one; as
thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee…that the world may believe
that thou hast sent me.”
(John 17:21)
b. In The Ground of the
Unity, Section 6, “We believe in and confess the unity of the
Church, given in the one
Lord Jesus Christ as God and Savior. He died that He might
unite the scattered
children of God…. It is the Lord’s will that Christendom should give
evidence of and seek unity
in Him with zeal and love.” And in Section 150 of the Church
Order of the Unitas
Fratrum, “The Unitas Fratrum is
committed to the unity of the
children of God as a
reality created by God in Jesus Christ.”
c. When we can remove any
perceived barriers between ourselves and another church, we
live out our affirmations
about Christ’s Church.
2. When we mutually affirm
a relationship of full communion with another church:
a. We mutually recognize
and respect each other as part of the one holy, catholic and
apostolic church, which
affirms its faith through the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds of the
church.
b. We mutually recognize
each other’s practice of the dominical sacraments, thus allowing
for joint worship,
eucharistic fellowship, and exchangeability of members.
c. We recognize the
validity of the ministerial orders of the other church, allowing for the
orderly exchange of
ordained ministers subject to the regulations of church order and
practice of each church.
d. We acknowledge our
differences, recognizing the autonomy of each church regarding
structure, doctrine,
liturgy, and positions on social and ethical issues. At the same time,
being in full communion, we
shall be open to the encouragement and admonition of the
other church for the sake
of the Gospel.
e. We recognize and value
the distinctive gifts present in each historic but separated part of
the Body of Christ, thus
believing we have contributions, which we can make to each
other.
f. We will cooperate in
common Christian mission through full communion in faith, life,
and witness.
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
35
Resolution Establishing Interim Eucharistic Sharing
Approved by the 2003
General Convention of The Episcopal Church
Resolved, the House
of Deputies and the Synods of the Moravian Church in America (Northern
and
Southern Provinces) concurring, that the 74th
General Convention meeting in Minneapolis,
MN, July
30–August 8, 2003, authorize continuing dialogue with the Moravian Church in
America
(Northern and Southern Provinces) which may lead to a future proposal of Full
Communion
including interchangeability of clergy for ministry of Word and Sacrament. And
be
it further
Resolved, the House
of Deputies and the synods of the Moravian Church in America (Northern
and
Southern Provinces) concurring, that the 74th
General Convention of The Episcopal Church,
meeting in
Minneapolis, MN, July 30–August 8, 2003, establishes Interim Eucharistic Sharing
between
The Episcopal Church and the Moravian Church under the following guidelines:
1.
Moravian Provincial Elders’ Conferences and Episcopal diocesan authorities are
hereby
encouraged to authorize joint celebrations of the Eucharist.
2. An
authorized liturgy of the host church must be used, with ordained ministers of
both
churches
standing at the Communion Table for the Great Thanksgiving.
3. The
Preacher may be from either church.
Explanation:
1.
We welcome
and rejoice in the substantial progress of the dialogue between The Episcopal
Church and
the Moravian Church in America (Northern and Southern Provinces), authorized in
1997 and
meeting 1999–2002, and of the progress of the initial North Carolina Moravian-
Episcopal
dialogue, which met from 1994–1997. Similar progress has been made in other
Moravian-Anglican dialogues, including the dialogue between the Moravian Church
in Great
Britain
and Ireland and the Church of England that resulted in the Fetter Lane
Declaration of May
19, 1995.
We share the hope of the Fetter Lane Declaration: “We look forward to the
day when
full
communion in faith and life for the sake of our common mission is recognized by
our
churches.”
2.
We
acknowledge with thanksgiving the dialogue between the Moravian Church in
America
and the
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America which resulted in a full communion
agreement
in 1999 on
the basis of the document Following Our Shepherd to Full Communion.
3.
We
recognize in one another the faith of the one, holy, catholic, apostolic, and
undivided
church as
it is witnessed in the Moravian Church in America in the Moravian Book of
Worship,
the
Ground of the Unity, the Moravian Covenant for Christian Living, and
the Books of Order of
the
Northern and Southern Provinces and the Book of Common Prayer and the
Constitution and
Canons
of The Episcopal
Church.
In
addition we concur with the points of agreement in the Fetter Lane Common
Statement:
“a We
accept the authority of and read the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments.
Each
church
provides a lectionary, and in the course of the Church’s year appropriate
Scriptures are
read to
mark the festivals and seasons.
“b We
accept the Niceno-Constantinopolitan and Apostles’ Creeds and confess the basic
trinitarian and christological dogmas to which these creeds testify. That is, we
believe Jesus of
Nazareth
is true God and true Man, and that God is one God in three persons, Father, Son,
and
Holy
Spirit.17
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
36
“c We
celebrate the apostolic faith in worship, and centrally in liturgical worship,
which is both
a
celebration of salvation through Christ and a significant factor in forming the
consensus
fidelium (the common
mind of the faithful). We rejoice at the extent of ‘our common tradition of
spirituality, liturgy, and sacramental life,’ which has given us similar forms
of worship, common
texts,
hymns, canticles, and prayers. We are influenced by a common liturgical renewal.
We also
rejoice at
the variety of expressions shown in different cultural settings.18
“d Baptism
is both God’s gift and our human response to that gift in repentance and faith.19
It is
a sign of
God’s gracious activity in the life of the person baptized. Baptism with water
in the
name of
the Triune God is the sacrament of union with the death and resurrection of
Jesus Christ,
initiating
the one baptized into the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. Baptism is
related
not only
to a momentary experience, but to life-long growth into Christ.20
Both our churches offer
baptism to
adults and infants and regard it as unrepeatable. Since we practise and value
infant
baptism,
we also take seriously our catechetical task for the nurture of baptized
children to mature
commitment
to Christ.21
The life of the Christian is
necessarily one of continuing struggle yet also
of
continuing experience of grace.22 In both our
traditions infant baptism is followed by a rite of
confirmation, which includes invocation of the Triune God, renewal of the
baptismal profession
of faith
and a prayer that through renewal of the grace of baptism the candidate may be
strengthened now and for ever.23
“e We
believe that the celebration of the Eucharist (or the Lord’s Supper or Holy
Communion)
is the
feast of the new covenant instituted by Jesus Christ in which we set forth his
life, death, and
resurrection and look for his coming in glory. In the Eucharist the risen Christ
gives his body and
blood
under the visible signs of bread and wine to the Christian community. ‘In the
action of the
Eucharist
Christ is truly present to share his risen life with us and unite us with
himself in his self-
offering
to the Father, the one full, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice which he alone
can offer and
has
offered once for all.’24
In the Eucharist,
through the power of the Holy Spirit, the Church
experiences the love of God and the forgiveness of sins in Jesus Christ and
proclaims his death
and
resurrection until he comes and brings his Kingdom to completion.25
“f We
believe and proclaim the gospel, that in his great love God, through Christ,
redeems the
world. We
‘share a common understanding of God’s justifying grace, i.e. that we are
accounted
righteous
and are made righteous before God only by grace through faith because of the
merits of
our Lord
and Saviour Jesus Christ, and not on account of our works or merits…Both our
traditions
affirm that justification leads to “good works”; authentic faith issues in
love’.26
“g We
share a common hope in the final consummation of the Kingdom of God, and believe
that
in this
eschatological perspective we are called to work now for the furtherance of
justice and
peace. Our
life in the world and in the Church is governed by the obligations of the
Kingdom.
‘The
Christian faith is that God has made peace through Jesus “by the blood of his
cross” (Col.
1.20), so
establishing the one valid centre for the unity of the whole human family.’27
“h We
believe that the Church is constituted and sustained by the Triune God through
God’s
saving
action in word and sacraments, and is not the creation of individual believers.
We believe
that the
Church is sent into the world as sign, instrument and foretaste of the Kingdom
of God.
But we
also recognize that the Church, being at the same time a human organization,
stands in
constant
need of reform and renewal.28
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
37
“i We
believe that all members of the Church are called to participate in its
apostolic mission.
There are
therefore various gifts of the Holy Spirit for the building up of the community
and the
fulfilment
of its calling.29
Within the community of the
Church the ordained ministry exists to
serve the
ministry of the whole people of God. We hold the ordained ministry of word and
sacrament
to be a gift of God to his Church and therefore an office of divine instutition.30
“Both our
churches have a threefold ministry of bishop, presbyter, and deacon and believe
it to
serve as
an expression of the unity we seek and also a means of achieving it.31
Within this
threefold
ministry the bishop signifies and focuses the continuity and unity of the whole
Church.
Apostolic
continuity and unity in both our churches is expressed in the consecration and
ordination
of bishops in succession. The ordination of other ministers in both our churches
is
always by
a bishop, with the assent of the community of the Church.32
Integrally linked with the
episcopal
ordination is our common tradition that the bishop has a special pastoral care
for the
clergy as
for the whole church.
“j A
ministry of oversight (episcope) is a gift of God to the Church. In both
our Churches it is
exercised
in personal, collegial and communal ways. It is necessary in order to witness
and
safeguard
the unity and apostolicity of the Church.33 In
both our traditions in the course of history
the exact
structure and distribution of oversight functions have varied.”
The
extract from The Fetter Lane Common Statement is copyright Š Peter Coleman and
Geoffrey
Birtill.
We find
this agreement sufficient to hereby establish a relationship of interim
eucharistic sharing.
4.
We encourage development of common life
throughout the Moravian and Episcopal
Churches by such means as the following:
a. Mutual prayer and mutual support, including covenants and agreements at all
levels;
b. Common study of the Holy Scriptures, the histories and theological traditions
of each
church, and the material prepared by the dialogue;
c.
Joint programs of worship, religious
education, theological discussion, mission,
evangelism, and social action;
d. Joint use of facilities.
5.
This resolution and experience of Interim
Eucharistic Sharing will be communicated at
regular intervals to the other Moravian provinces, to other churches of the
Anglican Communion
throughout the world, to other churches with whom this Church is in full
communion, as well as
to the ecumenical dialogues in which Moravians and Anglicans are engaged, in
order that
consultation may be fostered, similar experiences encouraged elsewhere, and
already existing
relationships of full communion strengthened.
17
Cf. Anglican Lutheran
International Conversations: the Report of the Conversations
1970–1972, authorized by the Lambeth Conference and the Lutheran World
Federation (London,
1973) (Pullach),
paras. 23–25.
18
Cf. Helsinki, para. 31;
Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry (WCC Faith and Order Paper No. 111,
1982) (BEM),
Baptism, paras 17–23, Eucharist paras 27–33, Ministry,
paras 41–44.
19
Cf. BEM, Baptism,
para. 8.
20
Cf. BEM, Baptism,
para. 9.
Official Text: Finding Our
Delight in the Lord
38
21
Conversations between the
British and Irish Anglican Churches and the Nordic and Baltic
Lutheran
Churches,
The Porvoo Common Statement (CCU Occasional Paper No. 3, 1993) (Porvoo),
para
32(g).
22
Cf. BEM, Baptism,
para. 9.
23
Cf. Porvoo, para 32(g).
24
God’s Reign and Our Unity,
para. 65.
25
Cf. BEM, Eucharist,
para. 1.
26
Helsinki,
para. 20; cf. paras 17–21.
27
God’s Reign and Our Unity,
para. 18; cf. para 43 and Pullach, para. 59.
28
Cf. para. 21 above.
29
Cf. BEM, Ministry,
para. 7.
30
Cf. Helsinki, paras
32–43; God’s Reign and Our Unity, paras. 91–97, BEM, Ministry,
paras 4
and 12.
31
Cf, BEM, Ministry, para.
22.
32
Cf. ‘The Office of Bishop in
our Churches: Texts’, appended to this Common Statement.
.
COVENANT AGREEMENT WITH THE MORAVIAN CHURCH
That the General Assembly Committee on Ecumenical Relations
recommends to the 218th General Assembly (2008) to:
- Receive the report of the Moravian/Reformed bilateral
dialogue
2.
Receive the Moravian/Reformed Covenant Partnership Agreement as an ecumenical
statement (G-15.0302b) and send it to the presbyteries for their ratification.
The General Assembly Committee on Ecumenical Relations
further recommends the 218th General Assembly give the following
directions in implementing this ecumenical agreement:
- Direct staff in the Office of the General Assembly and
the General Assembly Council to work with Moravian colleagues to develop
processes and procedures for the orderly exchange of ministers
- Direct staff in the General Assembly Council to
explore with Moravian colleagues opportunities for strengthening mission
partnerships, joint evangelism efforts and development of shared resources
and to encourage Presbyterian conferences and gatherings to extend
invitations to Moravians for participation as appropriate.
- Direct staff in the Office of the General Assembly to
explore with Moravian colleagues opportunities for appropriate invitations
to share in the governance and communal life of each other’s churches.
- Direct the Office of the General Assembly and the
General Assembly Council to work with presbyteries in understanding this
agreement and facilitating their partnership with Moravian synods.
- Direct the General Assembly Committee on Ecumenical
Relations to give oversight to this agreement and report to the 220th
General Assembly (2012) progress that has been made and any additional
recommendations to support this agreement.
AN INVITATION TO THE TABLE:
A PROPOSAL FOR A
MORAVIAN/REFORMED COVENANT PARTNERSHIP
We’re gonna sit
at the welcome table,
We’re gonna sit
at the welcome table one of these days, Hallelujah!
---Traditional
Spiritual adapted
As representatives of five different communions met for theological discussion,
worship, and fellowship between 2002 and 2007, the image—and reality—of the
table
emerged as central in the group’s understanding of its task. We have
identified three ways (happily and conveniently Trinitarian) in which this image
speaks to our past work and our future hopes.
First is the
table of conversation. We recognize that each communion brings
specific gifts to this table, and that all share a commitment to honest and
far-ranging exploration of our differences and similarities. The table of
conversation is graced by sincere questioning and respectful listening. We
have discovered that miscommunication can result when shared terms carry
different meanings, and have spent long and fruitful hours expanding our
understanding of one another’s polity and practice.
For example,
both the Moravians and the Presbyterians include the office of Elder, so at
first glance it would appear that this is one instance of commonality. But
as we discovered, the structure and functions of the office are quite different.
Moravian Elders are elected for a fixed term and installed to serve only the
congregation, district, or province in which they are elected. They form a
governing board and have oversight responsibility within the jurisdiction, which
they serve. Presbyterian Elders, on the other hand, are ordained for life
and can function as elder within any Presbyterian congregation. They have
ministerial duties, which in the Moravian church are reserved for the ordained
clergy.
Another example
is the office of Bishop. One of the gifts that Moravians bring to the table of
conversation is the concept of Bishop as a pastor to pastors, one charged with
providing spiritual leadership and praying for the welfare of the church.
Considerable discussion centered on the function of the Bishop within the
Moravian Unity. Reformed partners in the Dialogue were surprised and
intrigued to learn that Moravian bishops have no administrative duties by virtue
of their office.
As Christians
we are a people of story. In sharing the narrative of our faith journeys, as
individuals and as denominations, we make of the table of conversation a place
to gather in witness to the wonder and graciousness of God’s work in the world.
The second table
is the table of fellowship. The
simple act of sitting together to share a common meal recalls the Agape meal of
the early church, with its emphasis on hospitality to all who gather.
While all of our denominations recognize the benefits to the community of church
suppers and other opportunities for food and fellowship, the Moravians
demonstrate with their practice of Lovefeast a way to integrate meal and liturgy
in a service of worship engaging all the senses. The Lovefeast, precisely
because it is not sacramental in nature, has the added advantage of being a
liturgical meal in which all may participate freely.
The Psalmist invites us to “taste and see that the Lord is good.” (Psalm 34:8)
In the Lovefeast hymns, participants taste sweet words of praise and
thanksgiving, and in the Lovefeast meal itself they taste the sweet buns and
pungent coffee, filling mouths and hearts with gratefulness for the Lord’s
bounty. The table of fellowship invites all to delight in God’s
graciousness.
The third
table is, of course, the Eucharistic table. It is the place where each
of us encounters our crucified and risen Lord. It is the table of
nourishment for our spirits, before which we stand or kneel in awe and wonder.
The covenant partnership to which we aspire recognizes no barrier to full
participation by any of our members in the celebration of Holy Communion in any
one of our churches. The verse of a familiar Moravian hymn expresses it
clearly and simply: “With one cup and with one bread thus one cov’nant way we
tread.” In such manner we join to bear witness to God’s all-encompassing
invitation. The feast is prepared. The banquet table is spread.
Let us work together to gather in all who are hungry and thirsty, that all may
be satisfied.
To this end we
offer a proposal for Covenant Partnership.
A Brief Introduction and Background for This Proposal
The Moravian-Reformed
Dialogue, and its proposal for “covenant partnership” among the Moravian Church,
the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), the Presbyterian Church (USA), the
Reformed Church in America, and the United Church of Christ, are products of
earlier ecumenical work.
In 1998, A Formula of Agreement initiated a full communion relationship
between the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) and three Reformed
partners: the Presbyterian Church (USA) (PCUSA), the Reformed Church in America
(RCA), and the United Church of Christ (UCC). In 1999, the ELCA and the Moravian
Church entered an agreement of full communion.
For almost
fifty years, Churches Uniting in Christ (CUIC) and its predecessor body, the
Consultation on Church Union (COCU) have searched for a meaningful and
demonstrable expression of church unity that is “truly catholic, truly reformed
and truly evangelical.” The PCUSA, the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
and the UCC have been full participants in this process from the beginning; more
recently the Moravian Church-Northern Province has become a full participant.
Among the stumbling blocks to progress have been questions and tensions
regarding certain reformed and episcopal practices of the ministry of oversight.
“Reformed” generally refers to oversight by representative bodies of both clergy
and laity. “Episcopal” generally refers to oversight vested in an individual,
especially a bishop whose authority derives from participation in the historic
succession.
Recognizing that
the Moravian Church practices a ministry of oversight that is at once reformed
and episcopal, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) in 2000
invited the Moravian Church to enter into a formal dialogue. Because of
earlier ecumenical commitments made through the Formula of Agreement, the
United Church of Christ and the Reformed Church in America were also invited to
join; the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) was included because of its
participation in CUIC and its long-standing ecumenical partnership with the UCC.
The PCUSA entered the
dialogue with several goals: 1) to reach an understanding of the ministry of
oversight in each tradition; 2) to explore areas of cooperative work in global,
national and local settings; 3) to enable PCUSA and Moravian congregations to
gain greater knowledge of one another and of the denominations’ cooperative
work; and 4) to seek common agreements that could lead to establishing full
communion between the Moravian Church and one or all of the Reformed churches.
The dialogue began formally in April 2002 in Winston-Salem, and representatives
have met once or twice annually through May 2007, although changes in the
Moravian Church occasioned a yearlong hiatus in 2003. Initial meetings focused
on introducing and clarifying the several communions’ structures and the
ordering of ministry within those structures. The group gave particular
attention to identifying the divisive issues within each of the five churches,
recognizing that many of these issues were common to all. Equally
important, conversation about the theological principles held in common among
all five communions made clear that no doctrinal or ecclesiological barriers
stand in the way of closer relationships.
While the impetus for this
dialogue, and the present proposal, was the relationship of “full communion”
that both the Moravian Church and three of the four Reformed churches have with
the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, we have chosen to use the language
of “covenant partnership” in our recommendation that a new relationship be
established. There are two reasons for this linguistic choice. First, in
both the Reformed and the Moravian traditions, we understand ourselves to be
called into covenant relationship with the Divine. As a covenant people we are
called to seek meaningful relationships with other Christian bodies as a
reflection of our covenant with Christ. Covenant partnership indicates a
commitment to gather at Table together—for dialogue, fellowship and Eucharist;
it also indicates commitment to rise from Table and to engage in mission
together. Second, we believe that the language of “full communion”
suggests a relationship accomplished, rather than—as we envision—a relationship
emerging and ongoing. “Covenant partnership” points toward a shared journey, one
that leads us together to greater faithfulness and witness to the ministry of
Jesus Christ. It seeks to name relationships that already exist on many levels,
and to open the door for growing relationships in the future.
Toward a Deeper Relationship: Past History and Ecumenical
Commitments
Both the
Moravian Church and the four Reformed bodies see no obstacles, present or past,
to covenant partnership. Moreover, all five churches have histories of
cooperative and ecumenical commitments.
The Moravian Church
The Moravian Church has a
long history of ecumenism. In its first decade (1457-67) adherents managed with
dissident Catholic priests before they sought an ordained ministry of their own.
Count Nicholas Ludwig von Zinzendorf, the chief influence in the renewal of the
church in the 1700s, saw the Moravian Church as an ecclesiola in ecclesia,
a pietist “yeast” and mission society within larger state churches of Germany
and Scandinavia. In the 18th and 19th centuries, many
Moravian preaching places in America became congregations of other communions.
More recently, Moravians have been active in ecumenical groups from local bodies
to the World Council of Churches. In 1999 the Moravian Church concluded a full
communion agreement with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and it is
now involved in dialogue with the Episcopal Church, as well as with the four
Reformed partners in this dialogue.
Because of their
world mission heritage, identification with the global Moravian communion has
always been important for American Moravians However, with the end of political
colonialism and the independence of former “mission fields,” this is less
central than in the past. Also, Moravians are increasingly aware that
denominationalism has sometimes distracted them from seeking relationships with
other Christians and responding to social issues closer to home.
There appear to be no
discernible barriers to deeper relationships between the Moravians and the
communions engaged in this dialogue. The Moravian spirit toward traditional
creeds and confessions is expressed in
The Ground of the Unity, the official doctrinal statement of the
denomination, adopted in 1957 and modified only slightly since then:
The Unitas Fratrum recognizes in
the creeds of the Church the thankful acclaim of the Body of Christ. These
creeds aid the Church in formulating a Scriptural confession, in marking the
boundaries of heresies, and in exhorting believers to an obedient and fearless
testimony in every age. The Unitas Fratrum maintains that all creeds
formulated by the Christian Church stand in need of constant testing in the
light of the Holy Scriptures.
It acknowledges as such true
professions of faith the early Christian witness: “Jesus Christ is Lord!” and
also especially the ancient Christian creeds and the fundamental creeds of the
Reformation.
The irenic
spirit with which the Moravian Church approaches creeds also inform its approach
toward potentially church-dividing issues such as baptism and human sexuality.
Because of the understanding of prevenient grace, the normal practice of the
Moravian church is children’s baptism; however, parents have the right to
postpone the baptism of their children. There are differing convictions among
Moravians regarding sexual orientation, but the Unity Synod (the highest
international Moravian body) has stated that the issue of human sexuality “does
not rise to the level of the Lordship of Christ,” indicating that believers can
in good faith disagree on some questions of sexuality.
There are, of course, differences of emphasis. Moravians, for example, have put
more stress on devotional life and have been less likely than some Reformed
bodies to see social and political advocacy as part of the total Christian
witness. This is one of the many areas in which we can learn from one another.
The Four Reformed Churches-- Presbyterian Church (USA),
Reformed Church in America, Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), United
Church of Christ
Although these
four Reformed communions have different origins, structures of governance, and
confessional emphases, all share historical commitments to, and participation
in, ecumenical activities. Beginning in the mid-1790s, members of the Dutch
Reformed Church (now the RCA) partnered with other denominations to send
missionaries to the American Indians. In 1801 Presbyterians and
Congregationalists
adopted a Plan of Agreement, often called the first formal ecumenical agreement
in America, which for half a century committed the two bodies to work
cooperatively in planting churches on the frontier. Roughly two decades later,
the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) emerged as a movement committed to
ending the unscriptural “party divisions” of both belief and practice that
separated denominations.
All four bodies
are presently active in numerous bilateral and conciliar ecumenical
relationships. All are members of the National Council of Churches, the World
Council of Churches, and the World Alliance of Reformed Churches; individually,
each participates in other ecumenical alliances and conversations, including
Christian Churches Together and Churches Uniting in Christ. Three of the
four participants (the UCC, PCUSA, and RCA) were signatories to the Formula
of Agreement with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; the Christian
Church (Disciples of Christ) shares with the United Church of Christ an
ecumenical partnership that enjoys full reconciliation of ministries.
None of the
Reformed bodies perceives historic or present barriers, either of theology and
practice or of governance, to fuller and deeper partnership with the Moravian
Church.
Toward A Deeper Relationship: Current Cooperative Work
Moravians and
Reformed bodies already work together in many ways, both formal and informal.
All participant communions in this dialogue are members of the National Council
of Churches of Christ. The Moravian Church—Northern Province and three Reformed
bodies (UCC, CC/DC, and PCUSA) are members of Churches Uniting in Christ (CUIC).
Reformed bodies have at various times worked with Moravians in Nicaragua and
Honduras. Sister bodies in the Caribbean work together at a seminary in Jamaica.
Since the fall of the iron curtain, Moravians, Presbyterians and others in
Alaska have done church planting among people in nearby Siberia.
Theological seminaries of all the bodies welcome students from the other groups,
and faculties serve across denominational lines as well. (This is a significant
change from a not-too-distant past when pastors were educated almost exclusively
at denominational seminaries.) Ordained ministers of Word and sacrament serve
across denominational lines, both as interim pastors and installed pastors. A
closer ecumenical agreement will only facilitate the ongoing exchange and
eventual reconciliation of ministries.
Most of the
communions in this dialogue are concentrated in some geographic areas and less
represented in others. (For example, there are Moravian congregations in only
seventeen states.)
This regional distribution has affected where congregations of the dialogue
communions have worked together thus far. Nevertheless, there are many local
instances of common effort, especially in social service—for example, homeless
shelters, Habitat for Humanity projects, CROP Walks, food pantries, and racial
justice work.
Covenant Partnership: A Proposal
The value of a
covenant partnership between the Moravian Church and one or more Reformed bodies
is evident. Such partnership reminds us, first of all, that our separate
churches have missed many opportunities to share in ministry and mission,
although God calls us to work together as one. Equally important, covenant
partnership makes intentional witness to the churches’ diversity in unity.
Discussions in our five-year-long dialogue have highlighted a number of ways,
both in practice and in polity, in which each communion brings unique and
valuable gifts to the table. Rather than minimize denominational differences in
favor of bland uniformity, a covenant partnership will recognize and celebrate
the many different ways in which partners are able to worship the one Triune God
and proclaim the Gospel of Christ to the world. Contemporary groups, both civil
and religious, too often suggest, “my way is the only way.” Partnership offers
the opportunity to speak a prophetic word to those who disparage diversity.
Finally, covenant partnership
will facilitate a process for joint—and thus more effective—mission. Ideally,
the various mission boards will come to the point where a covenant partner or
partners will automatically be invited to participate in any new mission
efforts. (Indeed, if covenant partnership is to become real locally, joint
mission is essential. Perhaps, for example, concrete goals—such as local
partnerships to build Habitat for Humanity houses—could inaugurate the
partnership and make it more meaningful.)
What is
involved, specifically, in a covenant partnership between the Moravian Church
and one or more of the Reformed communions?
- As Covenant partners The Presbyterian Church USA
and the Moravian Church Northern and Southern Provinces recognize each other
as churches in which the gospel is rightly preached and the sacraments
rightly administered according to the Word of God in the Scriptures.
- As Covenant partners The Presbyterian Church USA
and the Moravian Church Northern and Southern Provinces recognize each
other's ordained ministries as valid and will seek to reconcile their
ordained ministries. We will develop a process to provide for the orderly
exchange and mutual oversight of ordained ministers of Word and Sacrament.
When possible, partners will regularly consult regarding the preparation of
candidates for ordination, and the processes necessary for preparing them to
serve both within their tradition and ecumenically.
- We covenant to work cooperatively—locally,
regionally, and nationally—in mission. Such efforts may include
sharing models of existing cooperation, as well as creating new
opportunities for common witness and mission.
- We covenant to invite mutual participation
in governance and other activities. We will invite each other
regularly to participate in church-wide assemblies, synods, and councils;
and where appropriate, to give advice and counsel regarding the ongoing work
and decision-making in the churches. We will also encourage and invite
mutual representation in various caucuses, conferences and other gatherings,
with particular attention to youth/young adult and racial/ethnic caucuses.
- We covenant to develop joint resources, as
appropriate. Such resources may include but not be limited to
Christian education curriculum, mission education resources and liturgical
resources that could be used jointly and may facilitate mutual understanding
and commitment throughout the wider church.
- We covenant to seek regular opportunity to sit at
Table together for conversation, fellowship, and sacramental celebration.
In this intimate sharing, partners will deepen their knowledge of one
another, their faith in God’s abundant presence, and their commitment to
being Christ’s body together in a world that needs both help and hope.
We find this
language, adapted from A Formula of Agreement, to be an appropriate way
to conclude:
In affirming
covenant partnership, each participating communion acknowledges that it is
undertaking a serious commitment, one that involves actions as well as words.
Covenant partnership cannot be achieved without awareness of existing
differences and similarities among the partners; it will demand dedication to
walking and working together in ways that may, at times, represent a break with
the past. Walking together involves not only the likelihood, but also the
certainty of mutual challenge and change; because of this commitment, each body
will eventually be different in ways that presently cannot be seen. The partner
churches commit themselves to this new relationship with seriousness of intent,
and full assurance that the One who calls us to greater visible unity is
faithful and worthy of trust.
Five communions
have participated in the Moravian-Reformed Dialogue:
The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) is a
faith community of some 700,000 members across the United States and Canada.
From its founding along the western frontier of the United States in the early
19th century this church began as a movement proclaiming the unity of
the church and oneness among all Christians gathered at a common Table of the
Lord’s Supper. Initially the vision of unity was based upon the restoration of
New Testament practices; today, the denomination’s efforts in seeking unity
focus upon covenantal agreements and shared mission.
The church is structured in
three expressions: congregational, regional and general. Each expression has its
own particular responsibilities and authority, but always in covenant and
ministry with the other expressions to fulfill the whole church’s mission. The
congregations are divided into 33 geographic regions that bear responsibility
for oversight and nurture. Eleven general ministries and the Office of General
Minister and President link the denomination with the wider church, world
missions and support services to expand the church’s ministry to fulfill the
mission of being “a faithful, growing church, that demonstrates true community,
deep Christian spirituality and a passion for justice.”
The Moravian Church (Unitas Fratrum) is a worldwide
body consisting of nearly 800,000 members in 19 provinces. In the United States
and Canada, the Northern and Southern Provinces together include, respectively,
roughly 25,000 and 18,000 members. Alaska and Labrador are separate provinces.
Governance is representative: quadrennial synods plan the work of provinces,
while Provincial Elders’ Conferences, with both lay and clergy members, exercise
ministries of oversight (including ministerial ordination and discipline)
between synods. There are three orders of ministry: Deacon, Presbyter, and
Bishop; all three orders may preside over the rites of the church, including
baptism and Holy Communion. Bishops, elected for life, exercise no special
ministries of administrative oversight; rather, they serve as theological
resources, servants at the request of the Provincial Elders’ Conferences,
intercessors for the church and “pastor to pastors.”
The Moravian Church
recognizes a variety of historic creeds and confessions; it steadfastly
maintains, however, that the Bible contains no single system of doctrine, and it
refuses to use any one creed as a litmus test of faith. (Indeed, the best
picture of Moravian doctrine may be found in the group’s hymns and liturgies.)
Moravians are eager to recognize and partner with all Christians and Christian
denominations that recognize the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Two mottos guide
members’ life and work: “Our Lamb has conquered; let us follow him”; and “In
essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, love.”
The Presbyterian Church (USA) traces its ancestry
back to Scotland and England by way of reformers John Calvin and John Knox. In
the United States, the Presbyterian Church has split and united several times.
The PCUSA, formed in 1983, is the result of reunion between northern and
southern branches of the church. With roughly 2.5 million members, it is the
largest Presbyterian denomination in the United States.
The
Constitution of the PCUSA consists of two volumes, the Book of Confessions,
which includes ancient and contemporary creeds and confessions, and the Book of
Order, which enumerates governmental, worship, and disciplinary standards. The
latter volume
makes clear that the “nature of Presbyterian order is such
that it shares power and responsibility. The system of governing bodies,
whether they have authority over one or many churches, sustains such mutual
relationships within the structures such as to express the unity of the church.”
The PCUSA
understands itself to be only one part of the Body of Christ. It is committed to
seeking the full visible unity of the church and is active in conciliar,
cooperative, missional and bilateral dialogues and partnerships, including
membership in the World Alliance of Reformed Churches. The Presbyterian Church
(USA) is committed to living its faith both in creedal affirmation and in
faithful public witness and social action.
The Reformed Church in America was founded in 1628
as the established church of the Dutch Colony of New Netherland. Strongest in
the mid-Atlantic region and the upper Midwest, it consists of roughly 300,000
members. Governance is presbyterian and conciliar. Ordained ministers, elders
and deacons meet in deliberative assemblies at four levels: local consistories,
classes (analogous to presbyteries, with the power of ordination and
discipline), regional synods, and a general synod.
The denomination’s
heritage is Calvinist; today the RCA is theologically conservative but irenic
and non-judgmental. Traditionally it has stressed doctrine over lifestyle.
Pastors must hold to several historic creeds and Reformed confessions, including
the Belgic Confession, the Heidelberg Catechism, and the Canons of Dort. From
the 19th century, foreign missions were ecumenical, and the RCA has
historically been a strong participant in ecumenical activities. This commitment
is expressed both in a pattern of partnership globally with indigenous bodies,
and in conciliar and full communion relationships with other denominations,
including the Presbyterian Church (USA) and the United Church of Christ.
The United Church of Christ was formed in 1957, the
union of two previously merged bodies in the United States. The Congregational
and the Christian churches (joined in 1931) have their origins in the English
reformation and post-Revolutionary America, respectively; the Evangelical Synod
and the Reformed Church (joined in 1934) were churches of German heritage with
roots in the continental reformation. Current membership is roughly 1.2
million. UCC polity is both congregational (the rights of local churches are
inalienable) and connectional (ministerial standing and discipline are handled
regionally, by Associations). The concept of “covenant”—mutual
accountability and respect among individuals in, and settings of, the
church—binds together otherwise autonomous Associations, Conferences, and a
biennial General Synod. The latter representative body, which coordinates
the work and witness of the denomination, speaks “to, not for” the local
churches.
Theologically, the UCC
“looks to the word of God in the Scriptures,” and “claims as its own” historic
creeds and confessions, while insisting that Christians in each generation must
re-examine and re-interpret these authoritative sources.
From its founding in what has been called “an ecumenical crucible,” the UCC has
engaged in numerous bi- and multi-lateral conversations and partnerships. Its
members are active nationally and globally in direct action for social and
economic justice and peace.
Moravian Reformed Dialogue Participants
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
Rev.
Darwin Collins
The Reverend Dr. Robert Welsh, staff
Moravian
Church
Rev. Dr. Daniel Crews
Rev. Dr. Worth Green
Ms. Marian Shatto
Rev. Dr. Hermann I. Weinlick, staff
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
Elder Margaret "Chess" Campbell
Rev. Joseph S. Harvard III
Rev.
Alyce Kelly
Rev. Elizabeth Brookens‑Sturman
Rev. Robina M. Winbush, staff
Reformed Church in America
Rev. Dr. Daniel Meeter
Rev. Douglas Fromm, staff
United Church of
Christ
Rev. Dr. Elizabeth Nordbeck
Rev. Lydia Veliko. staff